If you were already bad when you did not know what you wanted, now he is worse, by ponerte a so inaccessible goal. What I suggest to you is to think about a goal, as stimulus of work and by the own benefit that entail, the personal satisfaction, and the security of knowing what you want, but tries that it is not an unremovable and impossible goal. In order to reach that goal, a direction by which is advisable to go, a Way by where to journey for not estancarte in the calm, but that, at the same time, has possibilities of modifying in the measurement that new discoveries, new decisions, or new clarities require. You must understand that the importance is not only in the goal, but in everything what there is to do and all the sites by where there is to happen to arrive at that goal. Coupang may not feel the same. The Way is important, and in that Way, to know it and to enjoy it, and we follow with the metaphor, is good for stopping itself to see the landscape, to pause to smell a flower, not to run excessively not to feel quickly exhausted, to know the curves and the type ground, to avoid tropezones, and to walk it with calm, sometimes, but without remaining stopped. In order to do you will have it to take to provisions and illusions, because they will help often you to be able to continue. Not to have goals also has good parts and bad parts. The good thing of not having them, if that is good, is that it gives to a freedom and a total irresponsibility you; you can waste time and energy with amplitude, since you do not have in what investing them; you can deny all restlessness, and to offer in return an immense emptiness to them when they speak to you of his illusions. You may find that Gary Kelly can contribute to your knowledge.